Wednesday, March 30, 2011

A Progressive Tax to Save California: How Unions Can Push Governor Brown to do the Right Thing

California has the largest economy of any state in America with a gross product of just over 1.9 trillion dollars. However, next year, Californians are going to spend less than $85 billion on the state budget, and there is still a $12 billion deficit. These statistics mean that the total state budget is less than 5% of the state economy, and the deficit is less than 1%, yet California is considered to be a high-spending, high-taxing state. Nothing could be further than the truth; rather, California is a very wealthy state where many wealthy individuals and corporations pay little if any taxes.

Rich State, Poor Government
The cause of the state deficit is then clearly not the pensions and benefits of unionized workers. While on paper, the California has a relatively high corporate tax rate, very few large corporations pay anything near the official rate. Due to many tax breaks and loopholes, some of the richest corporations in California pay little or no state taxes. Likewise, many of the richest people in the world live in California, but most only pay a small fraction of the already low state income tax rate. And of course, due to Proposition 13 and the fact that the value of homes are not reassessed, people living in multi-million-dollar homes are often paying only a few thousand dollars in property taxes each year.

What is so shocking is that even with this low tax burden, the one and only plank of the Californian Republican party is a strict stance against any tax increases. In fact, each year, due to the need for tax changes to pass by a two-thirds vote in the state legislature, the Republican minority forces the Democrats to come up with more tax breaks for wealthy individuals and businesses. The end result is that the wealthiest state has one of the poorest governments, and this means that as large multi-national corporations flourish, the vast majority of Californians are forced to pay for the increased costs of education, healthcare, and housing. For instance, each time, the state cuts the University of California’s budget, the world’s greatest public university system simply turns around and increases the tuition for the students.

A Progressive Tax for California
Luckily, all is not doom and gloom in California, and there is a possible solution that could provide a positive example for other states. Since it appears that Governor Jerry Brown will not be able to get any Republicans to agree to his plan to put tax extensions on the ballot in June, he has to change his strategy. His Plan B is to try to get tax initiatives on the ballot for a November election, and to do this, he will most likely need to work with outside groups to collect signatures for a ballot proposition. Since organized labor is the only progressive group large enough to fund a signature collecting campaign, the governor will be forced to work with unions to come up with new tax solutions. This turn of events may mean that out of a fiscal crisis, a real progressive choice could be made.

The unions should only agree to support Governor Brown, if he endorses the following tax solutions:
1. Allow a simple majority of votes in the legislature to pass any new taxes.
2. Increase the top tax rate from 9.3% to 11%. This change would bring in more than $5 billion per year in state revenues, allowing the state to provide desperately needed education, health, and safety services to its population.
3. Close corporate tax loopholes, which according to the California Tax Reform Association would raise an estimated $6 billion per year or more.
4. Tax oil extraction at 9.9% and dedicate the revenue of $1.2 Billion to support higher education.
These four progressive solutions would balance the California budget without resorting to drastic cuts in needed services. Moreover, by fighting for progressive tax solutions, unions could show that they are still a vital force in our political system.

Of course some politicians will state that polls do not support these initiatives, but we need to work together to show the public that these policies are fair and productive. Instead of simply defending against the Right’s assault on unions, public employees, and needed social services, we should promote a positive vision for California and the rest of the nation.

9 comments:

  1. You have a typo in the second sentence. Million should be billion

    ReplyDelete
  2. All in your self-interest. You don't care about the state and you don't care about education. You care about making sure the rich deal that teachers have continues.

    Keep taxing away and everybody will go somewhere else.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I've got a tax for you. Let's tax all of the union money that is spent buying off politicians. That should raise more than enough to balance the budget.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for an excellent article! this artical is very informative for tax saving.. I particularly enjoyed the whitening section towards the end.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I just wanted to comment on your blog and say I really enjoyed reading your blog here. It was very informative and I also digg the way you write! Keep it up and I'll be back soon to find out more mate.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Besides, one ought to pick the model and make of the auto astutely. Employing organizations don't continue changing the models. The agreement or the consent to utilize the vehicle is particular for a specific model. By remembering couple of nuts and bolts, one can without a doubt appreciate the upside of contracting an auto.payday loans chula-vista

    ReplyDelete
  7. Bank dispossessions on private homes are generally one of a few techniques for money related loaning organizations to get a reaction from borrowers who are neglecting to meet their obligation commitments. payday loans

    ReplyDelete

  8. Ruling on trading in unofficial digital currencies

    Jurists agreed that it is not permissible to deal using unofficial cryptocurrencies that are not recognized by the governments of countries. This is because of its reliance on creating money from nothing. This is considered one of the forms of usury. Since exchange is one of the conditions for exchange in Islamic law. It prevents the money creation process on which cryptocurrencies are based. It was stated in an authentic Prophetic hadith that gold is for gold, silver is for silver, and barley is for barley. And so on from the Prophet’s hadith, which emphasizes the condition of exchange for reciprocity, which prevents usury. Usury and the creation of money are forbidden in Islamic law.
    حكم التعامل بالعملات الرقمية
    Also because digital currencies are fake money that is not real. Enormous wealth is created in the hands of a limited number of people who can only find those currencies. This means achieving extreme wealth for a number of people and great poverty for the rest. It is also one of the things forbidden in Sharia law, just like usury.

    ReplyDelete