Thursday, February 18, 2010

Why Tuition Goes Up and Quality Goes Down at American Universities

The New York Times has recently reported that a record number of Americans think that universities are now being run like business: “Most Americans believe that colleges today operate like businesses, concerned more with their bottom line than with the educational experience of students, according to a new study. And the proportion of people who hold that view has increased to 60 percent, from 52 percent in 2007.” People not only feel that the corporate mentality is hurting higher education, but they also think that university’s could do more while spneding less: “colleges could admit a lot more students without lowering quality or raising prices, and that colleges could spend less and maintain a high quality of education.” In other words, people believe that the business people running universities are bad for business, and these schools should be able to increase enrollments and lower costs, while improving the quality of instruction.

In response to this popular sentiment about the failures of American universities and colleges, the Times cites administrators who argue that due to the labor-intensive nature of higher education, costs cannot be contained and quality will inevitably suffer as students are forced to take out huge loans to pay for escalating tuitions. Of course, what these administrators fail to mention is that a major reason for the constant increase in costs is the constant increase in administrators and staff.

As I have previously documented in this blog, what is really going on in higher education is that administrators and staff are receiving a larger part of the budget pie, while practically everyone else is being asked to do more for less. Moreover, while the number of non-faculty employees goes up, administrators demand larger compensation packages and more power to make crucial decisions that were once the purview of professors.

Instead of simply bemoaning this situation, we have asked the state to audit the UC system, and the state has now approved our request. One of our central concerns is to see how administrative positions are funded and what really happens with state funds and student fees. Without this type of budget transparency, it will be very difficult to control the expansion of the administrative class. After all, the only people who can begin to reduce the cost of administration are the administrators themselves. However, we can pressure these people to do the right thing.


  1. A step in the right direction. Finally.

  2. ..."university's" ???? come on...

  3. it is not just administrator waste etc and expansion of the administrative group

    it is also a failure of profs to call out their own bad apples

    and an apathetic student body-apathetic in terms of looking at their own university's shortcomings

    all of it is to blame

    but the good news is that at least a few people are finally waking up to some of the issues - at least to the extent that an issue directly affects them i.e. tuition rates and jobs- which is something, I guess, at least...

  4. I'm verrrry worried about Yee's ultimate agenda which is to bring UC into direct state control. As much as I agree is wrong with UC administration, I think it would be far worse to end up hostage to the California state legislature and its own unique brand of incompetence. IOUs? CALPERS? No thanks.

  5. Also, hello, remember us? UC-AFT Unit 17? We're most likely counted in with staff in those bloat trends you're citing. Represent us or not?

  6. Librarians are not listed in the staff category I am discussing. Also, we are not supporting the state taking over the UC. We are just looking for some information that is supposed to be public knowledge.

  7. Bob,
    did you read this piece:

    two sentences in that piece just set me back, for lack of better words:

    "One thing I was not ready for is the degree of anger in the community. You cut people's salaries, hike their tuitions, or threaten layoffs, and they get angry."

    "Increasing out-of-state enrollment gives us a trigger to improve the education for in-state students as well. "

  8. I just wanted to comment on your blog and say I really enjoyed reading your blog here. It was very informative and I also digg the way you write! Keep it up and I'll be back soon to find out more mate.


  10. A payday credit is one of the least demanding and most advantageous techniques to getting quick cash. Locate the moneylender with the best general administration. You might not have the least hobby, but rather you will have an aggressive organization willing to go the additional mile with a specific end goal to keep clients safe. payday loans

  11. Instead of merely bemoaning this case, we've asked the state to audit the UC system, and also the state has currently approved our request. one in every of our central considerations is to visualize however body positions area unit funded and what very happens with state funds and student fees Management consulting Pakistan.