Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Regents Rubber Stamp Fake Future

At a special meeting on December 13th, the UC regents voted to endorse the Commission on the Future’s final report and the new pension plan. Before the actual vote on the Commission’s report, there was a long discussion of what they were actually being asked to vote on. Some of the regents weren’t sure if they were voting to endorse the whole report, part of the report, or none of the report. Part of the confusion stems from the fact that the final report doesn’t actually make any specific changes; rather, the report discusses general principles with mostly vague goals. Basically, the report argues that the UC system needs to educate more students with less money from the state; the major way the university plans to do more with less is by increasing the number of high-paying out-of-state students and transfer students, while finding ways to speed all students through the system, perhaps with the use of online courses or reduced course requirements.

As I pointed out in my public comments, the proposed solutions make neither fiscal nor educational sense. For instance, we find the following statement in the final report: “admittedly, the education of upper-division students is more expensive because of smaller classes and necessary specialization and facilities . . . From an aggregate perspective, however, transfer students require only two years of UC resources in order to graduate with a UC bachelor’s degree. . . Serving transfer students increases the number of degrees the UC can confer with any given level of instructional resources.” According to this contradictory logic, upper-upper division courses are more expensive, and therefore the way to save money is to increase the number of expensive classes and reduce the number of inexpensive ones.

This failure to grasp basic math and accounting is continued in the discussion of why they should increase the number of graduate students in relation to undergraduate students: “the education of graduate students is more expensive than undergraduate students, both in instructional costs and student financial support. Therefore, under current and baseline fiscal projections, funding for graduate enrollment growth would require that campuses reduce undergraduate enrollment — an unacceptable result in light of our access mission and commitment to the master Plan enrollment goals.” After clearly stating that graduate education is more expensive than undergraduate education, and that the increase in graduate students would result in an unacceptable decrease in undergraduates, we find the following argument: “Recognizing UC’s role in the master Plan as the state’s primary research and doctoral-granting institution, the commission recommends that the University increase the proportion of graduate enrollments from 22 percent of total enrollments to 26 percent by 2020-21, with individual targets set by each campus.” So the master plan tells us to have more undergraduate students, but the matser plan also tells us to have more doctoral students, so the solution is to do both even though the university cannot afford either.

As I have argued, the university simply refuses to admit that undergraduates are now subsidizing everything else in the UC system, and the only solution the university finds to any problem is to increase student tuition and to cheapen the quality of undergraduate education by turning to online classes, reduced requirements, summer courses, and fast degrees. In the Commission’s words, “the master Plan prescribes a ratio of 60:40 in upper division to lower division undergraduate students in order to have ample upper division spaces for community college transfer students (Uc’s ratio in 2009-10 was 66:34 due to freshmen entering with advanced placement and other college credit). Given these expected capital facility costs, UC will either need to find significant new revenues to supplement limited state funding or it will need to pursue alternatives to bricks-and-mortar classrooms and labs.” In the hands of this collection of amateur educationalists, the master plan is simply a rhetorical weapon to whip out to score points when needed. Not only does the final report lack vision, but it starts with all of the wrong premises.

In a moment of frustration, President Yudof declared that if someone else has a different plan, he would love to see it. But a coalition of unions has presented multiple plans to Yudof, and they have been simply ignored. One thing is clear, the regents will not be able to maintain the fiscal health and educational quality of the university if they cannot do simple math, and if they spend the majority of the time blaming the state for all of the UC’s problems, nothing will ever change.

Finally, on the pension front, several unions argued during public comment that retiree healthcare should be based on pay bands like all other current healthcare premiums. While this proposal was rejected by the regents, they did respond to a last minute plea by the highest-paid employees to re-consider waiving the IRS limit on pensions. In an incredible act of hubris, during the meeting, they re-wrote the final pension proposal, and it was unclear if the regents even knew which proposal was under consideration.


  1. can you point us to any intensive studies/reports/data on the students who transfer in from community colleges- the degrees they attain, the time to graduation, grade point avgs? do you know where that info is compiled?
    it seems we need to look closely at that info.
    disturbing the way the vote was handled -Marcus motion, Simmmons instruction to Marcus, Island and De La Pena among others confused on whether or not they were also voting on the contingent recommendations and Edley's disclosure that on the 20 and not the additional 60 recommendations were studied or really considered.

  2. Data on transfer students may be found in the Accountability Reports that UCOP posts.

  3. yes, thanks, found it.
    perhaps someone can discuss Regent Island and Odessa Johnson voting NO due to their concerns over minorities and enrollment. i am still trying to think through what it means.

  4. Thanks for sharing me a nice information about the fake future of regents rubber. i am willing to inform you that you give me a real information related to this topic. Thanks again!!!

    Regards from saad,


  5. You see,UMI Smartphone manufacture has risen sharply under the highly development of mobile phone technology.As it's known that UMI Smartphones are becoming more and more popular thoughout the world for the low price,vogue appearance and multifunction. If you are interested in UMI Smartphones, come to 1buy.com, a professional UMI Smartphones wholesaler, offering a huge range of UMI Smart Phones with high quality and low price. Shopping at 1buy, you can enjoy the low price, free shipping and considerate service. Shop for the best UMI smartphones at 1buy to save more money and live better If you have any question about the quality or services, please feel free to leave a comment and Share our product on facebook or upload your vedio on youtube can be win an new ipad now,Do it now.

  6. http://www.superbagsmarket.com/

  7. Keep in mind for taking your hottest gain stub or presumptively proof of earnings whereas your driver’s allow or presumptively discuss I .D .. merely at us of America advance, getting the bucks you'll have goes to be all of our prime priority. many of us accomplish all of our greatest title loans for you to help to make your home mortgage understanding comprehensive very advantageous, Most {of us of America|folks|people} would love would like you to continually rummage around for USA all on the short term borrowing wants.

  8. Terrible credit auto advances typically conveyed a high intrigue tag. Be that as it may, with expansion in rivalry, the interest rates on awful credit auto advance has nose jumped. Advances are currently accessible at extremely alluring rate of hobby. Payday Loans Chicago

  9. When you hunt online down the most minimal utilized auto advance rate you will have the capacity to get to countless loan specialists and analyze their offers effortlessly. Not just will you have the capacity to get to the sites of these organizations keeping in mind the end goal to discover the rates they offer, however you will likewise have the capacity to utilize vehicle advance value examination sites, survey locales and gatherings so as to choose dependable and legitimate moneylenders who offer a quality administration. payday loans

  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

  11. A moneylender needs to know whether you can pay back the advance. In the event that you have a standard occupation and can demonstrate your wage effectively with a T4 slip, a call to your manager, an assessment form or a financial balance proclamation, acquiring a credit ought to be moderately clear since the danger of not having the capacity to pay is little. www.usacheckcashingstore.com/san-diego