Wednesday, September 8, 2010

UC Offers New Pension Plan to Re-Distribute Wealth to the Top

Many pages into the UC Post-Retirement Benefits Task Force Report, one discovers that not only will the new proposed plan reduce the retirement benefits of many new hires by 50%, but the university also intends to increase the retirement payouts to the highest earners in the system. For example, under proposed plan A, people making $67,000 would see their average retirement payout go from $9,750 to $4,980, and their retiree healthcare benefit would be reduced from $6,135 to $3,313. Meanwhile, a senior manager making $250,000 in plan A, would face a retirement reduction from $66,000 to $50,000. While it may seem unfair that a person making a lower salary loses 50% of his or her retirement, but the person making $250,000 is only reduced 25%, we are told not to worry because social security will make up the difference for the person with a lower salary.

The central argument put forward by the steering committee of the Task Force is that since low-wage workers make most of their retirement income through social security, they can survive on a more reduced pension. However, the dissenting opinion by faculty and staff reveals the inequality built into this proposed system: “The Task Force report presents a graph showing the income replacement provided at various income levels by current UCRP, Option A, and Option B for employees retiring at age 65. This graph obscures the fact that Options A and B both represent a drastic reduction in pension benefits for those who retire in their late 50s, the average retirement age of UC staff. Option A would reduce the UCRP benefit of an employee retiring at age 60 with a salary of $55,000 by 56.8%, while Option B would reduce it by 42.4%.” If we factor in the current average age of retirement for particular groups of employment, we discover that the people making the lowest salaries will have their pensions reduced the most.

While current employees may feel that they have escaped this new system, it is important to note that all employees will be allowed to opt into the new tier, and the university will induce people to buy into a reduced benefit by raising the employee contribution level higher than the level for the new plan. At our last benefits briefing, we were told that in 2013, the employee contribution may go to 7% or even higher. According to the dissenting opinion of the faculty and staff, this type of forced choice may be illegal: “Historically, employee contributions to UCRP for employees enrolled in Social Security have never exceeded 3%; raising contributions above 7% fundamentally alters the terms of UCRP and has the effect of coercing current employees to “choose” the new plan. This coerced “choice” raises questions.”

The dissenting opinion not only objects to the new proposed plans on the grounds that they will create a great inequality in the system, but it is also clear that the proposed new tier will do nothing to bring down the costs of the system for the next ten years: “The employer normal cost of Option B, 9%, is higher than the 7.3% employer normal cost of Option A. However, as the Executive Summary itself documents, Options A and B result in the same cost to the operating budget for the years 2011-2021.” Since the proposed system is unjust and will not reduce the operating budget in the next ten years, it is unclear why the steering committee of the task force decided to recommend option A and B.

What is clear, however, is that the task force is controlled by people who are dedicated to increasing compensation at the top. As the dissenting opinion argues, “In recommendations #10 and #11, the Steering Committee proposes “restoring” benefits to those whose salary exceeds the IRS covered compensation cap. The Academic Senate is on record as opposing Recommendation #10 (Letter from Senate Chair Croughan to President Yudof, 03/08/09). Recommendation #11 appears to be a mechanism to extend retirement benefits (admittedly not drawn from the UCRP trust fund) to these highly compensated individuals in ways that are less visible to the public. While we advocate competitive total remuneration for all UC employee groups, it is unseemly to provide a large “restoration” of pension benefits to highly compensated employees at the same time that pension benefits of other groups are being curtailed; the effect on faculty and staff morale and on the University’s public relations would be highly detrimental.” It is strange that the UC uses social security income as a justification for cutting the benefits of low-wage workers, but supplemental retirement packages for the highest compensated people are justified on the grounds of the need to retain “talent.”

Of course one of the great talents of the senior management group is their ability to increase their own incomes, while they claim that everyone else must sacrifice. The dissenting opinion brings this message home by showing how the proposed benefit cuts represent a sustained reduction in compensation for most employees: “It should not be overlooked that the University’s credibility with current employees will be severely damaged, and it will be understood that furloughs are to be replaced with permanent cuts in total remuneration---furloughs by another name.” As I have argued, the retirement liabilities are being used to scare employees into accepting reduced pay and benefits; let’s all join together to fight this pernicious move.

12 comments:

  1. "Contentious Plan For Sagging UC Pension Fund"
    in San Francisco Chronicle

    read the last two paragraphs...

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/09/10/MNHB1F8ENT.DTL

    ReplyDelete
  2. I just wanted to comment on your blog and say I really enjoyed reading your blog here. It was very informative and I also digg the way you write! Keep it up and I'll be back soon to find out more mate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, i agree with you. This article is really enjoy to read.

      - backlink dofollow -

      Delete
  3. I just wanted to comment on your blog and say I really enjoyed reading your blog here. It was very informative and I also digg the way you write! Keep it up and I'll be back soon to find out more mate.

    http://www.zopophoneshop.com/zopo-zp950.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. blog online must see this blog for example how to blogging?

      Delete
  4. ZOPO ZP810 HD SCREEN MT6589 QUAD CORE CPU 3G ANDROID PHONE
    ZOPO ZP810 has 5 inch 720*1280 pixel HD screen, with MTK MT6589 quad-core processor, 1GB RAM, 4GB ROM, and 8MP rear camera, installed Android 4.1 OS.? Already update to android4.2os since 15th April
    ZOPO ZP810 HD SCREEN MT6589 QUAD CORE CPU 3G ANDROID PHONE
    ZOPO ZP810 has 5 inch 720*1280 pixel HD screen, with MTK MT6589 quad-core processor, 1GB RAM, 4GB ROM, and 8MP rear camera, installed Android 4.1 OS.? Already update to android4.2os since 15th April

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sometimes unions are a good thing.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Nice article, thanks for the information. It's very complete information. I will bookmark for next reference
    jaring futsal | jaring golf | jaring pengaman proyek |
    jaring pengaman bangunan | jaring pengaman gedung
    http://www.jual-jaring.blogspot.com/
    http://www.agen-jaring.blogspot.com/
    http://www.pancasamudera-safetynet.blogspot.com/
    http://www.toko-jaring.blogspot.com/
    http://www.pusat-jaring.blogspot.com/
    http://jualjaringpengaman.blogspot.com/
    https://pancasamudera.wordpress.com/
    https://pasangjaringfutsal.wordpress.com/
    https://jualtambangmurah.wordpress.com/
    https://tokojaring.wordpress.com/
    https://jualjaringfutsal.wordpress.com/
    https://jaringfutsal.wordpress.com/


    ReplyDelete

  7. I was very encouraged to find this site. I wanted to thank you for this special read. I definitely savored every little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post.

    Visit Us

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    http://annemearadeadmotherofbenstiller.blogspot.com/2015/05/serum-korea-asli-produkkecantikangrosir.html Serum Korea Asli Produkkecantikangrosir.com Black New Formula Original

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Serum Korea Asli Produkkecantikangrosir.com Black New Formula Original

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Serum Korea Asli Produkkecantikangrosir.com Black New Formula Original http://annemearadeadmotherofbenstiller1.blogspot.com/2015/05/serum-korea-asli-produkkecantikangrosir.html

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Serum Korea Asli Produkkecantikangrosir.com Black New Formula Original http://annemearadeadsmotherofbenstiller.blogspot.com/2015/05/serum-korea-asli-produkkecantikangrosir.html

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Serum Korea Asli Produkkecantikangrosir.com Black New Formula Original Visit Us

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    http://annemearadeadmotherofbenstilleri.blogspot.com/2015/05/serum-korea-asli-produkkecantikangrosir.html Serum Korea Asli Produkkecantikangrosir.com Black New Formula Original

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    http://annemearadeadsmotherofbenstiller.blogspot.com/2015/05/serum-korea-asli-produkkecantikangrosir_25.html Serum Korea Asli Produkkecantikangrosir.com Black New Formula Original

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



    ReplyDelete
  8. Borrower can profit unsecured motorbike advances at low intrigue rate without putting resource as insurance. Thus, in these sorts of credits you have no risk to repossess of your property. Aside from this, no insurance needed for valuation which spares parcel of time. Thus, you can take unsecured low intrigue motorbike advances quicker with less paper work. Check Cashing

    ReplyDelete
  9. It might be conceivable to get financing from the bank offering the abandoned home. This particular financing can facilitate bank possessed deals to close rapidly. Payday Loans

    ReplyDelete
  10. The one better than average bit of news is that banks would prefer not to abandon a manufactured house, unless they must choose between limited options. This is because of the way that most they deteriorate in esteem more like an auto, as opposed to acknowledge in esteem like a house. check cashing

    ReplyDelete